ÌÇÐÄÔ­´´

Headshot of Marsha Cohen

Marsha Cohen

Emerita Professor of Law

Bio

Professor Marsha Cohen came to California to clerk for the late Associate Justice Raymond L. Sullivan, then of the California Supreme Court. Thereafter she joined the public interest law office of Consumers Union, publisher of Consumer Reports, in Washington, D.C., practicing primarily in the areas of federal food and drug and product safety law. She came to UC Law SF after a short stint at UC Davis. Professor Cohen has served on various government and National Academy of Sciences panels on a variety of topics, most notably on food safety and sodium. For almost eight years she was a member of the California State Board of Pharmacy, and was its first non-pharmacist president.

During her years at UC Law SF, Professor Cohen most regularly taught Torts, Administrative Law, and Consumer Protection, and for many years she was the faculty supervisor of the Judicial Externship Program. Her area of narrowest specialty is food and drug law, and she is the coauthor of Pharmacy Law for California Pharmacists, now in its 7th edition.

Professor Cohen is the Founding Executive Director of Lawyers for America, which provides an exciting alternative path in legal education and helps legal nonprofits and government to meet the overwhelming need for public interest lawyering.

Professor Cohen has founded, served on the boards of, and raised money for, a variety of nonprofits (including Friends of the Company, the Cutting Ball Theater, San Francisco Day School, and Smith College). She urges theater-lovers to check out the exciting and unusual theater offered near UC Law SF by the Cutting Ball Theater (www.cuttingball.com) and to support the youth of San Francisco performing with the Young People’s Teen Musical Theatre Company by attending its shows (www.yptmtc.org).

Selected Scholarship

Books


Marcus and Cohen’s Pharmacy Law for California Pharmacists (7th ed. 2012) (with Sami Sedghani).

Ìý(Marcus/Cohen 6th ed. 2008) (with William L. Marcus).

Ìý(Marcus/Cohen 5th ed. 2005) (with William L. Marcus).

Statutory Supplement: Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and Related Sections of Additional StatutesÌý(Food and Drug Law Institute 2005) (editor).

Ìý(West Group 2002) (with Michael R. Asimow).

Ìý(Marcus/Cohen 4th ed. 2002) (with William L. Marcus).

Ìý(Marcus/Cohen 3d ed. 1999) (with William L. Marcus).

Ensuring Safe Food: from Production to ConsumptionÌý(Committee to Ensure Safe Food from Production to Consumption, Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, National Academies Press 1998) (with committee).

Ìý(Applied Therapeutics 2d ed. 1997) (with William L. Marcus).

Pharmacy Law and RegulationsÌý(California State Board of Pharmacy 1983) (editor).

Journal Articles


Written Informed Consent—Translating into Plain Language. A Pilot Study, 9ÌýHealthcareÌý232 (2021) (with Agnieszka Zimmermann, Anna Pilarska, Aleksandra Gaworska-Krzeminska, & Jerzy Jankau).Ìý

Teaching While Pregnant: The History of Faculty Maternity at UC Hastings, 30ÌýHarv. Women’s L.J.Ìý203 (2019).Ìý

Exaggerated Response or Necessary Change?, 6ÌýUpdateÌý41 (2005).

A Mayor’s Dilemma—Can I Ignore a Statute I Think Is Unconstitutional? Another Skirmish in the Gay Marriage Wars, 30ÌýAdmin. & Reg. L. NewsÌý28 (Fall 2004).Ìý

Can We Talk? About Food and Drug Regulation and the First Amendment, 58ÌýFood & Drug L.J.Ìý741 (2003).Ìý

Rx by Email—Bad Medicine for a Chronic Rulemaking Illness, 29ÌýAdmin. & Reg. L. NewsÌý10 (Fall 2003).Ìý

Breaking the Federal/State Impasse over Medical Marijuana: A Proposal, 11ÌýHastings Women’s L.J.Ìý59 (2000).ÌýÌý

Kawaauhau v. Geiger, 12ÌýHealth L. NewsÌý4 (Sept. 1998).Ìý

Justice Sullivan: The Teacher, 46ÌýHastings L.J.Ìý3 (1994).Ìý

Summaries of Justice Raymond L. Sullivan’s Majority Opinions on the Supreme Court of California, 46ÌýHastings L.J.Ìý295 (1994).Ìý

Getting New Drugs to People with AIDS: A Public Policy Response to Lansdale, 18ÌýHastings Const. L.Q.Ìý471 (1991).Ìý

Regulatory Reform: Assessing the California Plan, 1983ÌýDuke L.J.Ìý231 (1983).Ìý

Federal Pension Benefits: The Reach of Preemption, 34ÌýHastings L.J.Ìý293 (1982).Ìý

What Drug Information Should the Consumer Have? A Consumer Perspective, 11ÌýDrug Info. J.Ìý34 (Mar. 1977).

Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co., 10ÌýU.S.F. L. Rev.Ìý683 (1976).Ìý

Enforcement Under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act—TheÌýParkÌýCase in Perspective, 30ÌýFood Drug Cosm. L.J.Ìý676 (1975).Ìý

“Uncle Sam”, the Product Safety Man: Consumer Product Safety Standards in the Marketplace and in the Courts, 2ÌýHofstra L. Rev.Ìý619 (1974) (with James A. Brodsky).Ìý

Legal/Regulatory Developments Affecting Food—Perspective of the Consumers Union, 29ÌýFood Drug Cosm. L.J.Ìý604 (1974).Ìý

The Consumer Class Action: An Endangered Species, 12ÌýSan Diego L. Rev.Ìý39 (1974) (with Peter H. Schuck).Ìý

Newspaper & Magazine Articles


A License for Safer Drugs: Drugmakers Need an Incentive to Study Safety After Products Hit the Market,ÌýWash. Post, Sept. 2, 2006, at A29.

Pharmacists, Conscience and Freedom,ÌýThe Jurist, Sept. 26, 2005.Ìý

Marijuana Decision Confirms That Even Medical Use is Illegal,ÌýL.A. Daily J., Jun. 12, 2001, at 6, col. 3.Ìý

Our Governor Should Do More to Bring Logic and Science to Medi–Pot Mess,ÌýL.A. Daily J., Aug. 10, 2000, at 6, col. 3.Ìý

Jibes Could Ruin Stanford for the First Daughter,ÌýSF Examiner, Sept. 19, 1997 (reprinted inÌýHouston Chron., sept. 21, 1997, at 5.Ìý

The Antique Labs in SF Schools; More Reasons for San Franciscans to Vote on Tuesday,ÌýSF Examiner, June 2, 1997.

Yes, Have a Legal Defense Fund—But Pledge to Repay Donors,ÌýL.A. Times, July 15, 1994.

Other Publications


Patient Drug Information: Does It Benefit the Public?,ÌýProceedings, National Association of Boards of PharmacyÌý(Apr. 29, 1979).

Policy Making and the Administrative Process,ÌýProceedings, 25th Annual Summer Program for California Lawyers, Continuing Education of the BarÌý(Aug. 14, 1979).

Who Owns the Food Label? A Policy Paper,ÌýProceedings, Conference on Nutrition and the American Food System, Part IIÌý(June 1-2, 1978).

Same Data, Different Results—A Study of the Use of Scientific Information in Legal DecisionmakingÌý(Comm. on Envtl. Decision Making, Comm’n on Natural Res., Nat’l Research Council, Decision Making in the Environmental Protection Agency Working Papers, Vol. II, 1977).

Education

  • Harvard Law School
    J.D., cum laude, Law

  • Smith College
    B.A., cum laude, English

Courses

  • Food and Drug Law

Related News

Ballot Measure Voter Guide